grammarly vs Deep L Write
Side-by-side comparison for UK business buyers. Scores 0–5 from our evaluation rubric; ✓ = claimed or available.
Comparison at a glance
| Dimension | grammarly | Deep L Write |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation friction (0–5) | 5 | 4 |
| Integration maturity (0–5) | 5 | 3 |
| Pricing transparency (0–5) | 4 | 4 |
| Security posture (0–5) | 4 | 3 |
| SME fit (0–5) | 4 | 4 |
| GDPR/DPA | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data location (UK/EU) | — | — |
| Starting price (GBP) | — | — |
| SSO | ✓ | — |
| Audit logs | ✓ | — |
— = not yet evaluated or not stated. How we evaluate.
Tool details
grammarly GDPR/DPA
Grammar, spelling, and style checker for emails, documents, and web writing. UK SMEs can use the free browser extension or paid plans for team writing quality; clear pricing and wide adoption.
Visit grammarly →Deep L Write GDPR/DPA
DeepL's writing assistant: grammar, tone, and rewrites in English and German. Useful for teams writing in multiple languages; free tier and paid plans with clear pricing.
Visit Deep L Write →How we evaluate
We score tools on five dimensions (0–5) from public, verifiable information: implementation friction (ease of getting started), integration maturity (APIs, SSO, export), pricing transparency, security posture (heuristic from vendor statements), and SME fit (overall fit for time-poor, budget-conscious UK SMEs). We also record flags: GDPR/DPA claimed, UK/EU data hosting, SSO, and audit logs.